rom the Secondary Principles of the Arising of Meaning and the true Nature of Absolute Free Will, it can be observed in the development of the One that the existence of Absolute Free Will by its inherent nature automatically means that its antithesis, Control, must be permitted to operate. Only by the cooperative interaction of the two Fundamental Principles is the conflict between Absolute Free Will and Control in any form resolved. Not in a confrontation and the end of one or the other, but in a continuing conflict and coexistence. Since the "optimization" of Absolute Free Will is necessary to the maximum potential of the development of the One through the interaction between the two Fundamental Principles, by definition and importance to Ultimate Reality as it exists, defined to be desirable, a conflict is created and can be observed as a polarity of positive and negative. Hence arises the polarity of Good and Evil with evil rooted in the control of the free will of one individuated consciousness by that of another. The polarity of good and evil is not just a matter of the semantics of relative terms as in: you cannot have good without evil; you cannot have up without down. It is a property of the Nature of Absolute Reality, the One as noted in the Primary Principles and the nature of Absolute Free Will.



ince the nature of all meanings is such that all of the above are relative constructs, existing only within the structure of their interrelationships, so is the nature of Good and Evil relative. The choice of Good as positive and Evil as negative is not however arbitrary. Since Absolute Free Will is both fundamental and necessary to the nature of the One as being developed by the interaction of the two primary principles, the polarity of Good and Evil is also fundamental to the nature of the One by the nature of Absolute Free Will. As stated before, Absolute Free Will holds a paradox in that Absolute Free Will requires the continued acceptance as necessary for Control of Free Will to be permitted. If Control / Evil were the primary reality, it would not permit Absolute Free Will as it exists. Good as associated with Absolute Free Will is thus the greater, all embracing and primary concept as it does in fact permit the existence of Absolute Free Will as including Evil / Control and results in the greatest Potential for the Being of the One. This is a circular relationship, as all relationships and meanings are fundamentally circular of necessity. The conflict between Good and Evil can thus never be absolutely resolved. It can only be a continuing series of skirmishes under the operation of the two Fundamental Principles. Good cannot prevail by exorcising Evil / Control as by so doing, Good will have inherently hindered the exercise of Absolute Free Will, thus in itself perpetuating Control / Evil. On this same basis, there is another paradox associated with the arising of Good and Evil. While the nature of Good and Evil is based on either not interfering with Absolute Free Will in any form or attempted Control and limitation of Absolute Free Will, the nature of the difference between Good and Evil is absolute and any action or creation is either good or evil with neither middle ground or other categories / options. However, there is another anomaly here in that the nature of Absolute Free Will requires that Evil / Control be permitted to be attempted. Also required by Absolute Free Will is that a being may defend itself against control or that beings may organize themselves into societies which create social mechanisms and institutions to prevent or put limitations on Evil / Control. The difference here is in the intent: the intent to do evil by controlling the free will of another being versus the intent to protect your own being or other "innocent" beings from the evil intent / control of other beings. There is no resolution to this paradox other than the achievement of universal ultimate spiritual love and the universal state of minimum entropy as previously discussed. It is fundamental to the nature of the One ~ Absolute Reality. It is uncertain if this state is achievable without resulting in a state of perfection which is also a state of stultification.



o another secondary principle is the necessity that Both Good and Evil arise simultaneously from the Nature of Absolute Free Will and must be permitted to exist within the Nature of Ultimate Reality ~ God. God cannot directly choose to eliminate the control of free will, considered as Evil, from the One without violating the existence of Absolute Free Will as fundamental to the Nature of Ultimate Reality. As a further explanation, if the above discussion is insufficient, consider that what we think of as absolute free will means that the possibilities for future choices by intelligent beings and resulting actions are maximized. But this is too simplistic a viewpoint as some intelligent beings may choose to maximize their free will choices at the expense of the free will choices of other beings. This reduces the outcomes of the total potential actions of beings by some degree. To make a decision at a higher level that interfering with the free will of another intelligent being is forbidden and disallowed could prevent this. However, it would simultaneously interfere with the free will choices of those who might choose control of others as their free will choice. This could be looked on as a good thing if you apply an absolute scale to good versus evil. However, we have seen from the Secondary Principle of the Arising of Meaning from the Void that there is no such absolute scale, only intents, choices and relative scales. In actuality, you will have eliminated more free will choices than you have saved. Specifically, you would have eliminated the range of choices and actions involved in the efforts of Good to overcome Evil. Being more specific, you would have eliminated a wide range of opportunities for altruism, self sacrifice, caring for and protection of others and a whole range of activities, analysis and knowledge relative to establishing and choosing codes of morality, studying the nature of this conflict of good versus evil and in general a major portion of the behavior of intelligent beings acting as part of societies. It has clearly been the conclusion of the One that the over all result of the existence of Evil outweighs the losses and produces an optimum version of Absolute Free Will. This will be further discussed on the next page.