n discussing the arising of Good and Evil from the Secondary Principles of the Arising of Meaning and the true Nature of Absolute Free Will, it has been observed in the development of the One that the polarity of Good and Evil, with evil rooted in the control of the free will of one individuated consciousness by that of another, must be permitted to exist. The details of interaction between intent and the initiation of action to invoke Intent have also been discussed and the primacy of Intent over Action explained.



ince the nature of meanings is such that they are all a relative construct, existing only within the structure of their interrelationships, so is the nature of Good and Evil relative. Since Absolute Free Will is both fundamental and necessary to the nature of the One, the polarity of Good and Evil is also fundamental to the nature of the One by the nature of Absolute Free Will. As stated before, Absolute Free Will holds a paradox in that Absolute Free Will requires the continued acceptance as necessary for Control of Free Will to be permitted. This is a circular relationship, as all relationships and meanings are fundamentally circular of necessity. The conflict between Good and Evil can thus never be absolutely resolved. It can only be a continuing series of skirmishes under the operation of the two Fundamental Principles. Good cannot prevail by exorcising Evil / Control as by so doing, Good will have inherently hindered the exercise of Free Will, creating something other than Absolute Free Will, thus in itself perpetuating Control / Evil. On this same basis, there is another paradox associated with the arising of Good and Evil. While the nature of Good and Evil is based on the intent to either non interfere with Absolute Free Will in any form and attempted Control and limitation of Absolute Free Will, the nature of the difference between Good and Evil is absolute and any intent, action or creation partakes of either one or the other. However there is another anomaly here in that the nature of Absolute Free Will requires that Evil be permitted to be attempted. Also required by Absolute Free Will is that a being may defend itself against control or beings may organize themselves into societies which create social mechanisms to prevent or put limitations on Evil / Control, so long as they do not themselves attempt restraint of intent and free will. The difference here is in the intent: the intent to do evil by controlling the free will of another being versus the intent to protect your own being or other "innocent" beings from the evil intent of other beings. The paradox consists in the fact that while Good and Evil are absolute as described above, partaking of either freedom or control, the over riding requirements of Absolute Free Will is that both Good and Evil be permitted to exist in a relative relationship. And while the relationship of Good and Evil is absolute as described above, in terms of actual behavior of individuated intelligences in the societies that exist within the One, there results a large range of behaviors which can only be considered as mixed Good and Evil, commonly referred to as gray areas versus the absolute relationship of black (evil) versus white (good). Thus arises Morality as the Study of the Paradox between the absolute nature of Good and Evil and the Relative Nature of most behavior.



o another secondary principle is the Arising of Morality as the study of the dichotomy between the absolute nature of Good and Evil versus the relative nature of the self protective or other controlling actions of individuals and societies when performed with the intent to minimize generation of more evil. Since you are, of necessity, controlling the absolute free will of another being when you act to protect yourself against the actions of that being, or perhaps to protect that being from the bad effects of its' own actions, your actions must partake of evil to some degree. If your true intent is protective of yourself or others whom you choose to protect or are obligated to protect, including the being whose free will you act against, then your intent is not evil although the action may result in the control of another and thus partake of the nature of evil. The true determining factor is in the Intent.